-
Website
http://www.learningseobasics.com -
Original page
http://www.learningseobasics.com/science-for-seo -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Search Engine Optimization
1 comment · 1 points
-
Andrea Hill (afhill)
2 comments · 5 points
-
Patricia Skinner
1 comment · 2 points
-
venkat
2 comments · 1 points
-
pittfall
2 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
One of the things that makes SEO so challenging, and so enjoyable to me is that it goes beyond how words rank in search engines, to how people read and understand and react to what words you choose as keywords, and what you write, and how you present what you create for your readers.
It is a science in trying to understand those kind of things while also writing something that will rank in search engines, and it is an art in making what you create appealing and engaging.
Defining what needs to be addressed, designing theories/questions/arguments, testing these theories, analyzing the results, and drawing conclusions are scientific methods & involved in the entire process-the research and the approach to the art of appeal/engagement.
The beauty behind science for SEO is anyone can be a 'scientist'. People need the right tools and be directed to circles that can offer these tools.
There are many free resources to learn SEO online. It is more difficult these days to find resources that are not hype, but they are out there. Hopefully, this site included. Hype is a distraction from the real education. Uncalled-for noise.
Thanks again for the comment,
Kimberly
I love your approach in defining each term. Science and scientists use experiments to prove any hypothesis. I don't see many SEOs using this approach. Mostly they just follow what some popular blogger has said of something they read in an forum.
More than the science, I like the art of SEO and SEM. I would put copywriting in art. Getting others to link to your site, talking about your business on their blogs, sites and forums is not a mechanical and objective task :)
Social networks are consistently scrutinized because of this. The influx of general readers and searchers, their temporary negligence in understanding the manipulative nature of the search results, and the influx of commercial content generators?
It will interesting to reevaluate this as the years progress. Neophytes do not remain neophytes forever.
There is no list.
To add..each of those 'copywriters' are, in actuality, referred to as 'SEO copywriters' for good reason. They are professional SEOs who also write copy which captivates their intended audiences. That's the point. That's the science and the art.